Understand the concept of vendor consolidation and how it can help reduce costs and improve efficiency while being aware of the associated risks.
Picture this: You’re a busy procurement manager, juggling dozens of vendor relationships. Each supplier has its own contracts, pricing structures, and payment terms. You’re drowning in paperwork and administrative tasks, with little time left for strategic sourcing.
Only, that’s not how it has to be.
Enter vendor consolidation. With this approach, you can transform your fragmented supplier landscape into a cohesive, efficient ecosystem that drives cost savings and operational excellence.
This blog post will explain the benefits, risks, and some best practices for vendor consolidation.
Vendor consolidation is a strategic approach where a company reduces its supplier base by analyzing existing vendors, and selecting a smaller group of preferred suppliers that can meet the company’s needs more efficiently and cost-effectively.
Rather than spreading purchases across a large number of additional vendors, vendor consolidation focuses on building stronger relationships with a core group of reliable, high-performing, and cost-effective vendors.
The goal is to leverage combined purchasing power, streamline procurement processes, and encourage close-knit partnerships with innovative vendors.
From contributing to cost savings and improved quality to keeping your supply chain resilient and efficient, vendor consolidation yields several undeniable benefits.
Here’s a quick rundown:
At the heart of any company’s procurement success is its ability to maximize value - getting the best products and services at the optimal total cost. To this end, vendor consolidation ensures you have the right mix of suppliers to meet organizational needs, leverage economies of scale, and eventually enjoy a competitive edge.
An essential aspect of vendor consolidation involves understanding the supply market landscape and identifying the most capable and reliable third-party vendors. At the end of the day, the advantages of vendor consolidation optimize supplier performance and product quality. The result is increased consistency and reliability in the supply chain.
Vendor consolidation helps organizations mitigate supply chain risk by carefully selecting financially stable, geographically diverse, and high-performing suppliers. By not putting all your eggs in one basket, you can ensure continuity of supply even in the face of disruptions.
Vendor consolidation enables companies to build stronger, more strategic relationships with a select group of suppliers. By focusing on fewer vendors, businesses can dedicate more time and resources to managing these key partnerships effectively. This includes setting clear expectations, establishing regular communication channels, and working together to identify and resolve issues promptly.
Simplifying the supplier base through vendor consolidation brings greater clarity to the supply chain. With a more manageable number of suppliers, companies can better track performance, spot potential risks, and ensure adherence to standards and regulations.
Moreover, having a consolidated vendor base allows for deeper visibility into the supply chain, enabling proactive risk identification and management. With fewer, more strategic supplier relationships, organizations can work closely with vendors to develop robust business continuity and risk mitigation plans.
Vendor consolidation carries risks such as reduced flexibility, increased vendor dependency, and potential impacts to service levels and specialization. Overconsolidation can also heighten exposure to severe vendor issues, so it’s crucial to weigh the risks and benefits and have contingency plans in place.
One of the main risks of an overconsolidated vendor base is reduced bargaining and buying power. If you become too dependent on a single vendor for a critical product or service, they may take advantage of the situation and raise prices. Without viable alternatives, you may have little choice but to accept the price hikes.
Consolidating vendors may lead to a less diverse and innovative supply base. With fewer vendors competing for your business, there may be less incentive for them to invest in new technologies, products or services. You may also have less flexibility to quickly adapt to changing market conditions or customer requirements.
The process of consolidating vendors can be complex and time-consuming, with many potential risks along the way. There may be significant costs associated with ending vendor contracts, transitioning to new vendors, and integrating systems and processes. If not managed carefully, the transition could result in quality issues, service disruptions, or unhappy internal customers.
When you consolidate vendors, you are essentially betting on their ability to meet your needs consistently over time. If a consolidated vendor’s performance starts to slip, it can have a major impact on your operations and reputation. With fewer vendors to fall back on, you may have limited options for quickly addressing performance issues.
The key is to strike the right balance - consolidating enough to drive meaningful operational efficiency and cost savings, but not so much that you become overly exposed to vendor-related security risks.
Vendor consolidation is not always due to poor vendor performance. In some cases, companies may have a fragmented vendor base due to decentralized purchasing or lack of spend visibility. They might not even realize they’re not getting the best value until they analyze their vendor spend holistically.
An effective vendor consolidation process ensures companies have an optimized supplier base and gives procurement the tools to manage vendors effectively.
Procurement teams should start by analyzing total company spend across all vendors and categories. Let them use spend analysis software to cleanse, classify, and visualize the data. They can also identify maverick spend and off-contract purchases. A spend analysis provides a complete picture of the current vendor landscape.
💡 Pro tip: Not sure where to start with spend analysis? Begin with the largest spend categories and vendors. Pareto’s 80/20 rule often applies in procurement - a small number of vendors usually account for the majority of the spend.
Many factors go into vendor segmentation, but it ultimately comes down to supply risk and profit impact. Procurement should plot vendors on a matrix with these two variables to determine which are strategic, bottleneck, leverage, or non-critical.
Aim to consolidate vendors in the leverage quadrant, where there is low supply risk and high profit impact.
In a center-led procurement model, a central team sets the overall category strategies and leads strategic sourcing initiatives like vendor consolidation. They provide tools, templates, and best practices, while local teams handle day-to-day purchasing. This model provides the spend visibility and coordination needed for effective vendor consolidation.
💡Pro tip: Establish a procurement council with representatives from each business unit and functional area. They can provide input on business requirements, identify local consolidation opportunities, and help drive change management during the transition.
P2P systems digitize and automate the end-to-end procurement process, from requisition to invoice payment. They enable procurement to establish spending controls, guide users to preferred vendors, and capture spend data.
When undertaking vendor consolidation, P2P systems can speed up vendor onboarding and help drive purchasing to the new consolidated vendor base.
💡 Pro tip: Integrate your P2P system with an e-procurement marketplace like Spendflo that includes vetted and pre-negotiated vendors. This makes it easy for employees to find and buy from preferred consolidated vendors while still providing adequate choice.
Vendor consolidation is not just about reducing the supplier base - it’s about developing closer, more strategic relationships with the retained vendors. Procurement should engage consolidated vendors as partners and work together on ongoing performance improvements, cost reductions, and innovations. Establish joint performance metrics, host regular business reviews, and consider gain-share arrangements.
At Spendflo, we make vendor consolidation simple and efficient. Our intake to procure platform automates the process of reducing your vendor base and optimizing your spending.
Here’s how Spendflo helps you achieve effective vendor consolidation
Curious? Talk with us now!
What is multi-vendor consolidation?
Multi-vendor consolidation is the practice of reducing the number of suppliers a company works with by combining purchases from multiple vendors into fewer, strategic partnerships. This approach aims to streamline procurement processes and potentially negotiate better terms.
What are the two main types of consolidation?
The two main types of consolidation are horizontal consolidation, which involves combining similar products or services from different vendors, and vertical consolidation, which focuses on integrating different stages of the supply chain with fewer vendors.
What is the purpose of vendor consolidation?
The purpose of vendor consolidation is to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and strengthen relationships with key suppliers. By consolidating vendors, companies can often achieve better pricing, simplify their supply chain management, and enhance overall procurement performance.