Learn the exact step-by-step framework to streamline your IT Procurement Process in 2024.
Companies are bleeding money on software they don’t use. Productiv's 2024 index found the average organization leaves about $18M in wasted SaaS licenses and redundancy on the table, while portfolios routinely stretch into the hundreds of apps to manage and secure.
That scale makes streamlining the IT procurement process mission-critical: it’s how you cut waste, reduce risk, and give teams the right tools faster. In the rest of this guide, we’ll show the practical steps to do exactly that, including IT procurement process steps and IT procurement best practices that actually stick.
IT procurement is the end-to-end process of sourcing, evaluating, and acquiring the software and IT services your organization needs to run securely and efficiently. It balances speed, cost, risk, and compliance so every purchase aligns with business objectives supported by a clear IT vendor evaluation framework, robust vendor risk assessment IT procurement, and cross-functional IT procurement collaboration from intake to renewal.
The typical IT procurement process often follows a familiar pattern:
The result? An IT procurement process that is often disconnected from the organization's broader strategic goals, leading to solutions that may meet immediate needs but fail to drive long-term value. The fundamental issue is that this approach treats procurement as a transactional, one-size-fits-all process rather than a strategic, value-driven one. This is problematic because not every IT purchase has the same impact on the business. Some investments may be critical for driving innovation and competitive advantage, while others may be more routine or tactical in nature. By applying the same procurement approach across the board, organizations risk over-investing in low-value purchases while under-investing in strategic ones.
Moreover, the traditional IT procurement process often fails to account for the full lifecycle costs and benefits of an IT investment. It may prioritize short-term cost savings over long-term total cost of ownership (TCO), or overlook important factors like vendor support, scalability, and interoperability.
If these considerations aren't carefully weighed upfront, the organization may end up with a solution that appears cost-effective initially but ends up draining resources and hampering agility in the long run.
In response, we've created the Procurement Performance Optimization Framework – a practical, step-by-step process that we've used to transform IT procurement functions for dozens of clients.Unlike the traditional approach to IT procurement, the first step of our framework is aligning procurement with the organization's broader IT strategy and architecture.
When we say that the procurement process is streamlined, we're talking about breaking down silos between IT procurement and other functions, and creating a seamless flow of information and activities from requirement definition to contract management.This visual framework is designed to show procurement professionals how to structure their process, but also helps them see where collaboration and strategic decision-making should take place.
We often find that many IT procurement processes are poorly aligned with the organization's broader IT strategy and architecture, leading to solutions that may meet immediate needs but fail to drive long-term value. Specifically, most IT procurement efforts are very reactive, focusing on fulfilling ad-hoc requests rather than proactively shaping the technology landscape to enable business objectives.
To solve this problems, here's the approach we use to align procurement with IT strategy:
1. Understand the organization's IT roadmap and strategic priorities
2. Map current and future technology needs to business capabilities
3. Identify gaps and opportunities in the existing IT landscape
4. Define procurement's role in enabling the target state architecture
If your IT procurement process operates in a silo, it's nearly impossible to deliver solutions that meet the needs of the business. That's why the next critical step in our framework is collaborating with key stakeholders to identify strategic priorities and detailed requirements. In an effort to streamline the process, many procurement teams limit stakeholder engagement to a brief requirements gathering exercise at the start of a sourcing event. The problem with this approach is that it often results in a shallow understanding of the business need and a lack of buy-in from the ultimate users of the solution. To give stakeholders a meaningful voice in the process, we believe the most important elements of collaboration are joint solutioning sessions and continuous alignment touchpoints.
So, let's dig into how the best IT procurement teams can get these elements right.
An effective joint solutioning session for a strategic IT procurement should address 4 key questions:
1. What are the critical business objectives this solution needs to support?
2. How will this fit into our overall IT landscape and roadmap?
3. What are the key functional and nonfunctional requirements?
4. How will we measure the success and value of this investment?
Many procurement teams engage stakeholders heavily upfront, but then go radio-silent until it's time to present the selected vendor. This not only creates a blind spot in terms of evolving requirements, but it also breeds mistrust and skepticism about procurement's ability to deliver. If stakeholders feel like they've been cut out of the process, they're far less likely to embrace the chosen solution with open arms. To keep everyone aligned and engaged, we recommend establishing a regular cadence of touchpoints throughout the procurement lifecycle.
This could include:
- Weekly status updates to share progress and gather feedback
- Mid-point check-ins to validate requirements and evaluation criteria
- Demos or proof-of-concepts to give stakeholders a tangible sense of the solutions
- Readout sessions to walk through the final recommendation and rationale
Wondering how much you could be saving on SaaS?
A Threat, Passivity, Risk, and Attractiveness (TPRA) analysis is a strategic way to evaluate and compare potential vendors during the IT procurement process. It provides a structured approach to assess each vendor across four key dimensions, helping procurement teams make informed decisions and mitigate potential risks.
Here's what you should know about each component of the TPRA analysis:
Threat: The threat component of TPRA assesses the potential risks or negative impacts a vendor could pose to your organization.
Passivity: Passivity refers to the level of responsiveness and proactivity demonstrated by the vendor. It assesses how engaged and committed the vendor is to meeting your organization's needs.
Risk: The risk component assesses the potential downsides or uncertainties associated with choosing a particular vendor.
Attractiveness: Attractiveness assesses the potential benefits and value a vendor can bring to your organization.
This helps procurement teams identify the vendors that offer the best balance of low risk, high engagement, and strong value potential.
Armed with a holistic view of value and a deep understanding of each solution, procurement is well-positioned to make a strategic, value-driven selection. However, this is where many teams drop the ball, by treating vendor selection as the end of the process rather than the beginning of a partnership. For example, they might focus all their energy on squeezing out the lowest possible price, without investing in the relationship and governance structures needed for long-term success. Or they might hand off the solution to the business and wash their hands of any ongoing responsibility.
To set the stage for a successful implementation and lasting value, we believe the most important elements of vendor selection are a win-win contracting approach and a partnership mindset.
An effective contracting approach for strategic IT solutions should balance 4 key objectives:
1. How can we structure the contract to minimize downside risk and ensure vendor accountability?
2. How can we build in the flexibility to adapt to changing business needs and technologies over time?
4. How can we keep the contract as streamlined and user-friendly as possible, without sacrificing key protections?
Your role doesn’t end once the contract is signed. You can’t hand off the solution to the business and move on to the next sourcing event. If you don't stay engaged and invested in the ongoing success of the solution, you miss out on countless opportunities to drive incremental value and mitigate risks over the life of the contract.
To build a true partnership with strategic vendors, we recommend a proactive, hands-on approach that includes:
- Joint governance committees to monitor performance and drive continuous improvement
- Regular business reviews to align on priorities and identify opportunities for innovation
- Collaborative problem-solving to address any issues or roadblocks that arise
- Proactive risk monitoring and mitigation planning
Further Reading:
Once the contract is signed and the partnership is established, it's time to bring the solution to life. However, this is where many procurement teams fumble the handoff, by assuming that their job is done once the purchase order is issued.
To ensure a smooth and successful implementation, try addressing these 4 dimensions:
1. What are the specific deliverables and milestones associated with the implementation?
2. What is the overall timeline and critical path for the implementation?
3. What internal and external resources are needed to execute the plan, and how will they be managed?
4. What are the key risks and dependencies associated with the implementation, and how will they be mitigated?
By following the steps in our framework, procurement can deliver a strategic IT solution that is well-aligned with business needs, rigorously vetted, and set up for success. However, the journey doesn't end there. To truly maximize the value of the investment over time, the IT procurement process needs to shift from a one-time sourcing mindset to an ongoing category management approach. This means proactively monitoring the solution's performance, identifying opportunities for optimization, and driving continuous improvement in partnership with the vendor and the business.
Here are some of the key activities that should be part of a continuous optimization mindset:
- Regular performance reviews against SLAs and KPIs
- Joint innovation sessions to identify new value-creation opportunities
- Competitive benchmarking and market intelligence gathering
- Proactive risk monitoring and mitigation
- Ongoing training and change reinforcement
- Value realization tracking and reporting
This not only maximizes the ROI of the initial investment, but also positions procurement as a strategic partner that is deeply invested in the success of the organization.
If your purchases still crawl through email threads and ad-hoc approvals, you’re bleeding time and money, shadow spend grows, renewals slip, and teams wait weeks for critical tools.
Spendflo fixes that. Customers use our AI-native, intake-to-procure workflows and expert negotiators to cut costs and move faster. Example: Let’s Do This saved $100K in one quarter and achieved a 4× ROI after streamlining their IT procurement with Spendflo.
And when procurement scales, the waste scales too duplicate licenses, unused seats, and vendor sprawl. Reveal Data unlocked nearly $500K in value by centralizing contracts, consolidating vendors, and letting Spendflo manage renewals and negotiations.
With Spendflo, you get the platform + people to align buying with your roadmap, standardize approvals, right-size licenses, and guarantee measurable savings so IT, finance, and security can focus on outcomes, not paperwork. Up to 30% savings with a minimum 2–3× ROI is what we stand behind.
Ready to see it in action? Book your free SaaS savings analysis and demo: Request a demo.
Look at clarity of intake (how requests are captured), governance (approval paths, risk and compliance checks), and how well your IT procurement process steps are documented end to end. Robust vendor due diligence should follow an IT vendor evaluation framework and include vendor risk assessment IT procurement controls. Assess total cost of ownership, implementation readiness, and speed-to-value. A strong program also measures adoption and outcomes post-purchase license utilization, SLA adherence, and ROI so learnings feed back into policies and vendor selection next time, supporting IT procurement best practices and IT procurement continuous optimization.
Start from business objectives and the IT roadmap, then translate them into measurable success criteria for each purchase (e.g., reduce time-to-resolution by 20%, meet data residency requirements). This is the core of aligning IT procurement with business strategy. Build a cross-functional squad (IT, security, finance, legal, and a business owner) to drive IT procurement collaboration, co-create the business case, define must-have controls, and set phase gates from pilot to scale during IT procurement implementation. Maintain ongoing stakeholder reviews and tie milestones to roadmap initiatives so decisions, adoption, and renewals stay anchored to strategic outcomes not ad-hoc requests.
Savings come from strategic sourcing and better execution: standardizing intake to avoid shadow spend, leveraging competitive bids and volume discounts, negotiating term flexibility, and right-sizing licenses based on usage data hallmarks of IT procurement best practices. Automating approvals and three-way matching cuts processing costs and errors, while ongoing vendor performance reviews and renewal playbooks prevent overbuying and lock-in. Over time, IT procurement continuous optimization compounds these gains, turning small improvements into materially lower TCO and freeing budget for higher-impact initiatives.